Related Documentation
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported MPLS Standards
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, QFX, SRX, T Series
- Accessing Standards Documents on the Internet
- J, M, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported LDP Standards
- M, MX, PTX, T Series
- Supported GMPLS Standards
Supported RSVP Standards
The Junos OS substantially supports the following RFCs and Internet drafts, which define standards for RSVP.
- RFC 2205, Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)—Version 1 Functional Specification
- RFC 2210, The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services
- RFC 2211, Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element Service
- RFC 2212, Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service
- RFC 2215, General Characterization Parameters for Integrated Service Network Elements
- RFC 2745, RSVP Diagnostic Messages
- RFC 2747, RSVP Cryptographic Authentication (updated by RFC 3097)
- RFC 2961, RSVP Refresh Overhead Reduction Extensions
- RFC 3097, RSVP Cryptographic Authentication—Updated Message Type Value
- RFC 3209, RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels
The Null Service Object for maximum transmission unit (MTU) signaling in RSVP is not supported.
- RFC 3473, Generalized Multi-Protocol
Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions
Only Section 9, “Fault Handling,” is supported.
- RFC 3477, Signalling Unnumbered Links in Resource ReSerVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
- RFC 4090, Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
- RFC 4203, OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
(OSPF extensions can carry traffic engineering information over unnumbered links.)
- RFC 4558, Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement
- RFC 4561, Definition of a Record Route
Object (RRO) Node-Id Sub-Object
The RRO node ID subobject is for use in inter-AS link and node protection configurations.
- RFC 4875, Extensions to RSVP-TE for Point-to-Multipoint TE LSPs
The following RFCs do not define standards, but provide information about RSVP and related technologies. The IETF classifies them variously as “Experimental” or “Informational.”
- RFC 2209, Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)—Version 1 Message Processing Rules
- RFC 2216, Network Element Service Specification Template
- RFC 4125, Maximum Allocation Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
- RFC 4127, Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
Related Documentation
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported MPLS Standards
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, QFX, SRX, T Series
- Accessing Standards Documents on the Internet
- J, M, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported LDP Standards
- M, MX, PTX, T Series
- Supported GMPLS Standards
Published: 2013-06-17
Related Documentation
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported MPLS Standards
- EX, J, M, MX, PTX, QFX, SRX, T Series
- Accessing Standards Documents on the Internet
- J, M, PTX, SRX, T Series
- Supported LDP Standards
- M, MX, PTX, T Series
- Supported GMPLS Standards