- play_arrow Understanding and Configuring Junos Routing Policies
- play_arrow Overview
- Policy Framework Overview
- Comparison of Routing Policies and Firewall Filters
- Prefix Prioritization Overview
- FIB Prefix Prioritization
- Accounting of the Policer Overhead Attribute at the Interface Level
- Configuring the Accounting of Policer Overhead in Interface Statistics
- Understanding Routing Policies
- Protocol Support for Import and Export Policies
- Example: Applying Routing Policies at Different Levels of the BGP Hierarchy
- Default Routing Policies
- Example: Configuring a Conditional Default Route Policy
- play_arrow Evaluating Routing Policies Using Match Conditions, Actions, Terms, and Expressions
- How a Routing Policy Is Evaluated
- Categories of Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Route Filter Match Conditions
- Actions in Routing Policy Terms
- Summary of Routing Policy Actions
- Example: Configuring a Routing Policy to Advertise the Best External Route to Internal Peers
- Example: Configuring BGP to Advertise Inactive Routes
- Example: Using Routing Policy to Set a Preference Value for BGP Routes
- Example: Enabling BGP Route Advertisements
- Example: Rejecting Known Invalid Routes
- Example: Using Routing Policy in an ISP Network
- Understanding Policy Expressions
- Understanding Backup Selection Policy for OSPF Protocol
- Configuring Backup Selection Policy for the OSPF Protocol
- Configuring Backup Selection Policy for IS-IS Protocol
- Example: Configuring Backup Selection Policy for the OSPF or OSPF3 Protocol
- play_arrow Evaluating Complex Cases Using Policy Chains and Subroutines
- play_arrow Configuring Route Filters and Prefix Lists as Match Conditions
- Understanding Route Filters for Use in Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Understanding Route Filter and Source Address Filter Lists for Use in Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Understanding Load Balancing Using Source or Destination IP Only
- Configuring Load Balancing Using Source or Destination IP Only
- Walkup for Route Filters Overview
- Configuring Walkup for Route Filters to Improve Operational Efficiency
- Example: Configuring Route Filter Lists
- Example: Configuring Walkup for Route Filters Globally to Improve Operational Efficiency
- Example: Configuring Walkup for Route Filters Locally to Improve Operational Efficiency
- Example: Configuring a Route Filter Policy to Specify Priority for Prefixes Learned Through OSPF
- Example: Configuring the MED Using Route Filters
- Example: Configuring Layer 3 VPN Protocol Family Qualifiers for Route Filters
- Understanding Prefix Lists for Use in Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Example: Configuring Routing Policy Prefix Lists
- Example: Configuring the Priority for Route Prefixes in the RPD Infrastructure
- Configuring Priority for Route Prefixes in RPD Infrastructure
- play_arrow Configuring AS Paths as Match Conditions
- Understanding AS Path Regular Expressions for Use as Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Example: Using AS Path Regular Expressions
- Understanding Prepending AS Numbers to BGP AS Paths
- Example: Configuring a Routing Policy for AS Path Prepending
- Understanding Adding AS Numbers to BGP AS Paths
- Example: Advertising Multiple Paths in BGP
- Improve the Performance of AS Path Lookup in BGP Policy
- play_arrow Configuring Communities as Match Conditions
- Understanding BGP Communities, Extended Communities, and Large Communities as Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Understanding How to Define BGP Communities and Extended Communities
- How BGP Communities and Extended Communities Are Evaluated in Routing Policy Match Conditions
- Example: Configuring Communities in a Routing Policy
- Example: Configuring Extended Communities in a Routing Policy
- Example: Configuring BGP Large Communities
- Example: Configuring a Routing Policy Based on the Number of BGP Communities
- Example: Configuring a Routing Policy That Removes BGP Communities
- play_arrow Increasing Network Stability with BGP Route Flapping Actions
- play_arrow Tracking Traffic Usage with Source Class Usage and Destination Class Usage Actions
- Understanding Source Class Usage and Destination Class Usage Options
- Source Class Usage Overview
- Guidelines for Configuring SCU
- System Requirements for SCU
- Terms and Acronyms for SCU
- Roadmap for Configuring SCU
- Roadmap for Configuring SCU with Layer 3 VPNs
- Configuring Route Filters and Source Classes in a Routing Policy
- Applying the Policy to the Forwarding Table
- Enabling Accounting on Inbound and Outbound Interfaces
- Configuring Input SCU on the vt Interface of the Egress PE Router
- Mapping the SCU-Enabled vt Interface to the VRF Instance
- Configuring SCU on the Output Interface
- Associating an Accounting Profile with SCU Classes
- Verifying Your SCU Accounting Profile
- SCU Configuration
- SCU with Layer 3 VPNs Configuration
- Example: Grouping Source and Destination Prefixes into a Forwarding Class
- play_arrow Avoiding Traffic Routing Threats with Conditional Routing Policies
- Conditional Advertisement and Import Policy (Routing Table) with certain match conditions
- Conditional Advertisement Enabling Conditional Installation of Prefixes Use Cases
- Example: Configuring a Routing Policy for Conditional Advertisement Enabling Conditional Installation of Prefixes in a Routing Table
- play_arrow Protecting Against DoS Attacks by Forwarding Traffic to the Discard Interface
- play_arrow Improving Commit Times with Dynamic Routing Policies
- play_arrow Testing Before Applying Routing Policies
-
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filters
- play_arrow Understanding How Firewall Filters Protect Your Network
- Firewall Filters Overview
- Router Data Flow Overview
- Stateless Firewall Filter Overview
- Understanding How to Use Standard Firewall Filters
- Understanding How Firewall Filters Control Packet Flows
- Stateless Firewall Filter Components
- Stateless Firewall Filter Application Points
- How Standard Firewall Filters Evaluate Packets
- Understanding Firewall Filter Fast Lookup Filter
- Understanding Egress Firewall Filters with PVLANs
- Selective Class-based Filtering on PTX Routers
- Guidelines for Configuring Firewall Filters
- Guidelines for Applying Standard Firewall Filters
- Supported Standards for Filtering
- Monitoring Firewall Filter Traffic
- Troubleshooting Firewall Filters
- play_arrow Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions
- Overview of Firewall Filters (OCX Series)
- Overview of Firewall Filter Profiles on ACX Series Routers (Junos OS Evolved)
- Understanding Firewall Filter Match Conditions
- Understanding Firewall Filter Planning
- Understanding How Firewall Filters Are Evaluated
- Understanding Firewall Filter Match Conditions
- Firewall Filter Flexible Match Conditions
- Firewall Filter Nonterminating Actions
- Firewall Filter Terminating Actions
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions (ACX Series Routers)
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions in ACX Series Routers (Junos OS Evolved)
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for Protocol-Independent Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for IPv4 Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for IPv6 Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions Based on Numbers or Text Aliases
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions Based on Bit-Field Values
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions Based on Address Fields
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions Based on Address Classes
- Understanding IP-Based Filtering and Selective Port Mirroring of MPLS Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for MPLS Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for MPLS-Tagged IPv4 or IPv6 Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for VPLS Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for Layer 2 CCC Traffic
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions for Layer 2 Bridging Traffic
- Firewall Filter Support on Loopback Interface
- play_arrow Applying Firewall Filters to Routing Engine Traffic
- Configuring Logical Units on the Loopback Interface for Routing Instances in Layer 3 VPNs
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Limit TCP Access to a Port Based On a Prefix List
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter to Accept Traffic from Trusted Sources
- Example: Configure a Filter to Block Telnet and SSH Access
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Block TFTP Access
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Accept Packets Based on IPv6 TCP Flags
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Block TCP Access to a Port Except from Specified BGP Peers
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter to Protect Against TCP and ICMP Floods
- Example: Protecting the Routing Engine with a Packets-Per-Second Rate Limiting Filter
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Exclude DHCPv6 and ICMPv6 Control Traffic for LAC Subscriber
- Port Number Requirements for DHCP Firewall Filters
- Example: Configuring a DHCP Firewall Filter to Protect the Routing Engine
- play_arrow Applying Firewall Filters to Transit Traffic
- Example: Configuring a Filter for Use as an Ingress Queuing Filter
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Match on IPv6 Flags
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Match on Port and Protocol Fields
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Count Accepted and Rejected Packets
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Count and Discard IP Options Packets
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Count IP Options Packets
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Count and Sample Accepted Packets
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Set the DSCP Bit to Zero
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Set the DSCP Bit to Zero
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Match on Two Unrelated Criteria
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Accept DHCP Packets Based on Address
- Example: Configuring a Filter to Accept OSPF Packets from a Prefix
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter to Handle Fragments
- Configuring a Firewall Filter to Prevent or Allow IPv4 Packet Fragmentation
- Configuring a Firewall Filter to Discard Ingress IPv6 Packets with a Mobility Extension Header
- Example: Configuring an Egress Filter Based on IPv6 Source or Destination IP Addresses
- Example: Configuring a Rate-Limiting Filter Based on Destination Class
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filters in Logical Systems
- Firewall Filters in Logical Systems Overview
- Guidelines for Configuring and Applying Firewall Filters in Logical Systems
- References from a Firewall Filter in a Logical System to Subordinate Objects
- References from a Firewall Filter in a Logical System to Nonfirewall Objects
- References from a Nonfirewall Object in a Logical System to a Firewall Filter
- Example: Configuring Filter-Based Forwarding
- Example: Configuring Filter-Based Forwarding on Logical Systems
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter to Protect a Logical System Against ICMP Floods
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter to Protect a Logical System Against ICMP Floods
- Unsupported Firewall Filter Statements for Logical Systems
- Unsupported Actions for Firewall Filters in Logical Systems
- Filter-Based Forwarding for Routing Instances
- Forwarding Table Filters for Routing Instances on ACX Series Routers
- Configuring Forwarding Table Filters
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filter Accounting and Logging
- play_arrow Attaching Multiple Firewall Filters to a Single Interface
- Applying Firewall Filters to Interfaces
- Configuring Firewall Filters
- Multifield Classifier Example: Configuring Multifield Classification
- Multifield Classifier for Ingress Queuing on MX Series Routers with MPC
- Assigning Multifield Classifiers in Firewall Filters to Specify Packet-Forwarding Behavior (CLI Procedure)
- Understanding Multiple Firewall Filters in a Nested Configuration
- Guidelines for Nesting References to Multiple Firewall Filters
- Understanding Multiple Firewall Filters Applied as a List
- Guidelines for Applying Multiple Firewall Filters as a List
- Example: Applying Lists of Multiple Firewall Filters
- Example: Nesting References to Multiple Firewall Filters
- Example: Filtering Packets Received on an Interface Set
- play_arrow Attaching a Single Firewall Filter to Multiple Interfaces
- Interface-Specific Firewall Filter Instances Overview
- Interface-Specific Firewall Filter Instances Overview
- Filtering Packets Received on a Set of Interface Groups Overview
- Filtering Packets Received on an Interface Set Overview
- Example: Configuring Interface-Specific Firewall Filter Counters
- Example: Configuring a Stateless Firewall Filter on an Interface Group
- play_arrow Configuring Filter-Based Tunneling Across IP Networks
- Understanding Filter-Based Tunneling Across IPv4 Networks
- Firewall Filter-Based L2TP Tunneling in IPv4 Networks Overview
- Interfaces That Support Filter-Based Tunneling Across IPv4 Networks
- Components of Filter-Based Tunneling Across IPv4 Networks
- Example: Transporting IPv6 Traffic Across IPv4 Using Filter-Based Tunneling
- play_arrow Configuring Service Filters
- Service Filter Overview
- How Service Filters Evaluate Packets
- Guidelines for Configuring Service Filters
- Guidelines for Applying Service Filters
- Example: Configuring and Applying Service Filters
- Service Filter Match Conditions for IPv4 or IPv6 Traffic
- Service Filter Nonterminating Actions
- Service Filter Terminating Actions
- play_arrow Configuring Simple Filters
- play_arrow Configuring Layer 2 Firewall Filters
- Understanding Firewall Filters Used to Control Traffic Within Bridge Domains and VPLS Instances
- Example: Configuring Filtering of Frames by MAC Address
- Example: Configuring Filtering of Frames by IEEE 802.1p Bits
- Example: Configuring Filtering of Frames by Packet Loss Priority
- Example: Configuring Policing and Marking of Traffic Entering a VPLS Core
- Understanding Firewall Filters on OVSDB-Managed Interfaces
- Example: Applying a Firewall Filter to OVSDB-Managed Interfaces
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filters for Forwarding, Fragments, and Policing
- Filter-Based Forwarding Overview
- Firewall Filters That Handle Fragmented Packets Overview
- Stateless Firewall Filters That Reference Policers Overview
- Example: Configuring Filter-Based Forwarding on the Source Address
- Example: Configuring Filter-Based Forwarding to a Specific Outgoing Interface or Destination IP Address
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filters (EX Series Switches)
- Firewall Filters for EX Series Switches Overview
- Understanding Planning of Firewall Filters
- Understanding Firewall Filter Match Conditions
- Understanding How Firewall Filters Control Packet Flows
- Understanding How Firewall Filters Are Evaluated
- Understanding Firewall Filter Processing Points for Bridged and Routed Packets on EX Series Switches
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions, Actions, and Action Modifiers for EX Series Switches
- Platform Support for Firewall Filter Match Conditions, Actions, and Action Modifiers on EX Series Switches
- Support for Match Conditions and Actions for Loopback Firewall Filters on Switches
- Configuring Firewall Filters (CLI Procedure)
- Understanding How Firewall Filters Test a Packet's Protocol
- Understanding Filter-Based Forwarding for EX Series Switches
- Example: Configuring Firewall Filters for Port, VLAN, and Router Traffic on EX Series Switches
- Example: Configuring a Firewall Filter on a Management Interface on an EX Series Switch
- Example: Using Filter-Based Forwarding to Route Application Traffic to a Security Device
- Example: Applying Firewall Filters to Multiple Supplicants on Interfaces Enabled for 802.1X or MAC RADIUS Authentication
- Verifying That Policers Are Operational
- Troubleshooting Firewall Filters
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filters (QFX Series Switches, EX4600 Switches, PTX Series Routers)
- Overview of Firewall Filters (QFX Series)
- Understanding Firewall Filter Planning
- Planning the Number of Firewall Filters to Create
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions (QFX and EX Series Switches)
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions (QFX10000 Switches)
- Firewall Filter Match Conditions and Actions (PTX Series Routers)
- Firewall and Policing Differences Between PTX Series Packet Transport Routers and T Series Matrix Routers
- Configuring Firewall Filters
- Applying Firewall Filters to Interfaces
- Overview of MPLS Firewall Filters on Loopback Interface
- Configuring MPLS Firewall Filters and Policers on Switches
- Configuring MPLS Firewall Filters and Policers on Routers
- Configuring MPLS Firewall Filters and Policers
- Understanding How a Firewall Filter Tests a Protocol
- Understanding Firewall Filter Processing Points for Bridged and Routed Packets
- Understanding Filter-Based Forwarding
- Example: Using Filter-Based Forwarding to Route Application Traffic to a Security Device
- Configuring a Firewall Filter to De-Encapsulate GRE or IPIP Traffic
- Verifying That Firewall Filters Are Operational
- Monitoring Firewall Filter Traffic
- Troubleshooting Firewall Filter Configuration
- play_arrow Configuring Firewall Filter Accounting and Logging (EX9200 Switches)
-
- play_arrow Configuration Statements and Operational Commands
- play_arrow Troubleshooting
- play_arrow Knowledge Base
-
Actions Performed for Hierarchical Policers on ACX Series Routers
The hierarchical parent policer impacts the packet loss priority (PLP) of the child policer. The PLP-based actions defined in the then statement of the are performed, based on the PLP derived from the combined processing of the child and parent policers. The then statement defined in the parent policer is not effective. This section contains the following topics that describe the methods of instantiation of aggregate or hierarchical policers and child or normal policers.
Hierarchical policer is not applicable on ACX5048 and ACX5096 routers.
Instantiation Methods for Child and Aggregate Policers
In the Junos OS, a certain policer configuration or a policer template is used to create multiple instances of the policer in the hardware using the template attributes such as the CIR, PIR, CBS, and PBS values specified in the template. You need not create multiple policer configurations with the same attributes for effective management by using aggregate policers.
Instantiation Methods for Child Policers or Normal Policers
For a normal policer or a child policer, if you specify a filter-specific
attribute for a policer by entering the filter-specific statement at the [edit firewall policer policer-name] or [edit logical-systems logical-system-name firewall policer
policer-name] hierarchy level, when you specify a ‘filter-specific’
clause, a single policer instance is used by all terms (within the
same firewall filter) that reference the policer. For example, if
a filter F1 contains terms T1 and T2, they refer to the same policer,
say P1. If you configure the policer P1 as a filter-specific type,
the same policer instance on the device is referred by both the terms
T1 and T2. In this case, F1 is attached to a logical interface named
IFL1, which is configured on the physical interface named IFD1.
By default, a policer operates in term-specific mode so that,
for a given firewall filter, the Junos OS creates a separate policer
instance for every filter term that references the policer. This operation
is the default instantiation mode if you do not configure the filter-specific statement. For example, consider a filter F1
that has two terms, T1 and T2. Both these terms refer to the same
policer, namely P1. With a term-specific mode of the policer, two
policer instances are created on the device, one each for terms T1
and T2.
Instantiation Methods for Aggregate Policers
The following modes of operations are possible for aggregate policers.
Global—Shares the same parent policer across all the child policer instances in the system.
Physical interface-specific—Shares the same parent policer across all the child policer instances of a certain physical interface. This mode is not supported on ACX routers.
Filter-specific—Shares the same parent policer across all the child policer instances of the same filter. This mode is not supported on ACX routers.
Interface-specific—Shares the same parent policer across all the child policer instances of the same logical interface. This mode is not supported on ACX routers.
You can include the aggregate global statement at
the [edit firewall policer policer-template-name] hierarchy
level to define an aggregate policer to be shared or applicable across
all of the child policer instances in the router. You can include
the aggregate parent statement at the [edit firewall policer policer-template-name]
hierarchy level to define an aggregate policer as the parent policer.
The following statement does not take effect for aggregate policers: set firewall policer policer-template-name filter-specific.
Consider a sample deployment in which an aggregate policer named P3 is configured. P1 and P2 are child policers. T1, T2, T3, and T4 are terms. F1 and F2 are filters. Logical interfaces, IFL1 and IFL2, are created on the underlying physical interfaces, IFD1 and IFD2 in this configuration. Interface address families are correspondingly created on the interfaces as IFF1 and IFF2.
If you configure an interface-specific filter, term-specific child policer, and the aggregate policer as the global policer, a single instance of P3 is created and associated with the child policers, P1 and P2. Two instances each of P1 and P2 are created, one for T1 within F1 and the other for T2 within F1. The two instances each of P1 and P2 are associated with IFL1 and IFL2, which in turn are bound to IFD1 and IFD2.
If you configure an interface-specific filter, term-specific or filter-specific child policer, and the aggregate policer is physical interface- specific policer, two instances of P3 are created. One instance of P3 contains two child policer instances of P1. P1 contains the filter F1 and term T1 to be applied to IFL1 and IFL2. The other instance of P3 contains two child policer instances of P1. P1 contains F1 and T1 to be applied to another two logical interfaces, IFL3 and IFL4.
If you configure an interface-specific filter, term-specific child policer, and interface-specific aggregate policer, two instances of P3 are created. Each P3 instance contains two P1 instances. One P1 instance contains F1 and T1 for IFF1 to be applied to IFL1. The other P1 instance contains F2 for IFF2 to be applied to IFL1. The other P3 instance contains two P1 instances. Here, one P1 contains F1 and T1 for IFF3 and the other P1 contains F2 and T1 for IFF4 to be applied on IFL2.
If you configure an interface-specific filter, term-specific child policer, and filter-specific aggregate policer, two P3 instances are created. Each P3 contains two P1 instances. One P1 contains P1, T1, F1 IFF1, applied to IFL1. The other P1 contains P1, T2, F1, IFF1, applied to IFL1. The third P1 contains P1, T3, F2, IFF2, applied to IFL1. The last P1 contains P1, T4, F2, IFF2, applied to IFL1.
